Scientific and technical background definition. The team's scientific background for the project. Technology transfer process

As a result of carrying out scientific research within the framework of the NUG project in 2012-2013. general theoretical foundations for codification and unification in private law were developed, which made it possible to solve the following problems:

establish scientific approaches to determining the object, methods and meaning of codification and unification of international private law; trace the history of the development of these processes in the field of private law; determine the features of international and national unification of international private law; analyze the relationship and mutual influence of modern codification and unification processes in international private law. As a result of the study, the following statements were convincingly proven:

1. In the process of codification of international private law in the 21st century, the following special types of codification can be distinguished:

• “step-by-step” codification is a type of codification during which a single law-making process, i.e. the formulation of isolated rules of international private law and the partial codification of its individual institutions culminate in the adoption of a new consolidated act of a systemic nature (Romania);
• consolidating codification is a type of codification carried out by combining a number of normative legal acts devoted to individual institutions and issues of international private law into the form of a single agreed act with the introduction of certain innovations into the source legal material (as a rule, this is the second stage of “step-by-step” codification) (Poland, Czech Republic);
• blanket codification is a type of codification that is based on the priority of an international unified act regulating certain cross-border private law relations by direct reference to it. A specific technique of blanket codification is the preservation of an article (section) of the law reserved for a future norm - a reference to a specific international treaty in the event of its ratification (Netherlands).

Due to the fact that in the 21st century, significant experience in law-making practice in international private law has already been accumulated and unified, consolidating and blanket codification should be considered the most effective, which explains the growing popularity of the latter in our time.

2. An inherent feature of the modern process of codification of international private law is the use (as the main method from the point of view of legislative technology) of international unified acts. In the 21st century, the national act of codification of international private law is a systematic presentation of domestic and international unified norms implemented in national law.

3. In the 21st century, national codifications may provide for the application of an international treaty that has not yet entered into force (for example, due to the lack of the required number of ratifications), provided that this treaty has already been ratified by the relevant state (Article 145 (2) Book 10 of the Civil Code of the Netherlands) . Thus, one of the possible functions of blanket codification of international private law is to ensure a proactive unifying effect of an international legal act in the domestic legal order. As a result of the use of reference, unified norms acquire legal force in the system of national law earlier than in the system of international law.

4. Currently, the principle of complexity is one of the specific principles of codification of international private law. This principle means that the codification process must coordinate all issues of legal regulation of certain social relations. To the greatest extent, this requirement is met by an autonomous comprehensive codification aimed at resolving conflicts of laws and jurisdictions in the widest possible sphere of cross-border private law relations. The effectiveness of the principle of comprehensiveness directly depends on the consistency of international legal and national legal approaches to the use of the conceptual apparatus and specific mechanisms of legal regulation in international private law (autonomy of the parties, the principle of the closest connection, protective clauses and return).

5. Along with the progressive development of domestic legislation, one of the main patterns of modern social development is the deepening internationalization of law, which means the convergence of legal systems, the deepening of their interaction and mutual influence. The internationalization of law is manifested, first of all, in the process of unification of legal norms. Unification of law is the creation of identical, uniform norms in the internal law of different states, the only way to create which is cooperation between states. Consequently, the unification of law means cooperation between states aimed at creating unified legal norms in the domestic law of a certain circle of states. The most striking example of the international unification of private law in the regional aspect is European private law, the most important component of which is conflict of law.

List of the main publications related to the chosen area of ​​research by the head and executors of the NUG for the last three calendar years before the date of announcement of the competition for 2012, 2013 and 2014

1. Erpyleva N.Yu., Getman-Pavlova I.V. Codification of private international law in the Republic of Georgia // International law and international organizations. 2012. No. 2. P. 44-75.

2. Erpyleva N.Yu., Getman-Pavlova I.V. Codification of international civil process in the Republic of Georgia // State and Law. 2012. No. 10. P. 54-65.

3. Getman-Pavlova I.V. Application of foreign public law norms in private international law // International public and private law. 2013. No. 4. P. 8-12.

4. Kasatkina A.S. Modern codifications of private law in the countries of Southeast Asia (People's Republic of China and Japan) // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2012. No. 2. P. 144-164.

5. Kasatkina A.S. Unification of conflict of laws rules of the European Union in the field of inheritance: new approaches // Legal issues. 2013. No. 3. P. 385-406.

6. Proshko P.V. Codification of private international law in the Netherlands // Legislation and Economics. 2013. No. 5. P. 49-54.

GOST R 57194.1-2016

NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

General provisions

Technologies transfer. General

OKS 03.100.01

Date of introduction 2017-05-01

Preface

1 DEVELOPED by the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Research Center "Institute named after N.E. Zhukovsky" (FSBI "National Research Center "Institute named after N.E. Zhukovsky"), Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Research Institute of Standardization and Unification" (FSUE " NIISU") and ANO "International Management, Quality and Certification" (ANO "MMKS")

2 INTRODUCED by the Technical Committee for Standardization TC 323 "Aviation Equipment"

3 APPROVED AND ENTERED INTO EFFECT by Order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology dated October 31, 2016 N 1542-st

4 INTRODUCED FOR THE FIRST TIME


The rules for the application of this standard are established in Article 26 of the Federal Law of June 29, 2015 N 162-FZ "On Standardization in the Russian Federation" . Information about changes to this standard is published in the annual (as of January 1 of the current year) information index "National Standards", and the official text of changes and amendments is published in the monthly information index "National Standards". In case of revision (replacement) or cancellation of this standard, the corresponding notice will be published in the monthly information index "National Standards". Relevant information, notices and texts are also posted in the public information system - on the official website of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology on the Internet (www.gost.ru)

1 area of ​​use

1 area of ​​use

This standard establishes the main goals and objectives in the field of technology transfer as part of the innovative activities of organizations, its basic principles, as well as general provisions regarding the practical application of technology transfer, including establishing the concept of technology transfer and other terminology used in the field of technology transfer.

The requirements of this standard are general and are intended to be applied by all organizations, regardless of their type, size and products of services provided.

2 Normative references

This standard uses normative references to the following interstate standards:

GOST R ISO 9000 Quality management systems. Fundamentals and Vocabulary

GOST R ISO/IEC 12207 Information technology. System and software engineering. Software life cycle processes

GOST R ISO/IEC 15288 Information technology. Systems Engineering. Systems life cycle processes

GOST R 55386 Intellectual property. Terms and Definitions

GOST R 56645.3 Design management systems. Innovation Management Guide

GOST R 56645.5 Design management systems. Terms and Definitions

Note - When using this standard, it is advisable to check the validity of the reference standards in the public information system - on the official website of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology on the Internet or using the annual information index "National Standards", which was published as of January 1 of the current year, and on issues of the monthly information index "National Standards" for the current year. If an undated reference standard is replaced, it is recommended that the current version of that standard be used, taking into account any changes made to that version. If a dated reference standard is replaced, it is recommended to use the version of that standard with the year of approval (adoption) indicated above. If, after the approval of this standard, a change is made to the referenced standard to which a dated reference is made that affects the provision referred to, it is recommended that that provision be applied without regard to that change. If the reference standard is canceled without replacement, then the provision in which a reference to it is given is recommended to be applied in the part that does not affect this reference.

3 Terms and definitions

This standard uses terms according to GOST R ISO 9000, GOST R 55386, GOST R 56645.3, GOST R 56645.5, as well as the following terms with corresponding definitions:

3.1 innovative scientific and technical basis; NTZ: Promising products of intellectual activity of enterprises and organizations in the field of science and technology, critical and breakthrough technologies, the development and implementation of which in industrial production and products will lead to an increase in the efficiency of industrial functioning and the entry into circulation of technical systems with new properties and qualities.

Note - Includes scientific backlog (NZ), scientific and technical backlog (NTnZ) and scientific and technological backlog (NTlZ).

3.2 scientific and technical basis; NTnZ: Promising products focused on creating a target technical system, which can be described in the form of a hierarchical structure of products and represents a mutually agreed upon network hierarchy of technical subsystems and components integrated into the target technical system using supporting systems technologies.

3.3 scientific and technological basis; NTlZ: Prospective products focused on creating a supporting system that promotes a promising target technical system through its life cycle and represents a mutually agreed upon network hierarchy of works implemented using existing or future organizational, technical and technological mechanisms.

Note - Promotion of the target system by supporting systems through its life cycle (LC) is regulated by GOST R ISO/IEC 15288 and GOST R ISO/IEC 12207. Manufacturers of scientific and technological products - researchers, systems engineers, design engineers, process engineers.

3.4 scientific background; NZ: The result of fundamental scientific research (new knowledge about phenomena, effects, laws, patterns, etc.), not directly related to existing or promising artifacts, technical means and technologies.

Note - Forms for presenting scientific research as a product are research reports, articles, monographs and other sources of information in unified presentations, including in archives of electronic documentation, oriented towards machine processing. Producers of scientific products and scientific resources are researchers.

3.5 technology passport: A document that serves to accumulate and store records about the current and previously achieved technology readiness levels (TCR) by the target technical system (TS), confirmed by the results of the CTR assessments.

Note - Including the results of technological audits (examinations), links to reports on research and development work (R&D), results of intellectual activity, acts of verification and validation of technical systems (TS), descriptions of specific implementations of systems, components and etc.

3.6 promising products: Products focused on the predicted or anticipated needs of actual or potential consumers.

3.7 products: The result of an activity focused on the existing (established) needs of actual or potential consumers.

NOTE Often a combination of goods and services.

3.8 technical system; TS: An integral set of a finite number of interconnected material objects, which has sequentially interacting sensory and executive functional parts, a model of their predetermined behavior in the space of equilibrium stable states and is capable, when in at least one of them (the target state), to independently carry out, under normal conditions, those envisaged by its design consumer functions.

Note - The vehicle and its states are always considered within the framework of its life cycle.

3.9 technology: The result of scientific and technical activity expressed in objective form, which includes, in one or another combination, inventions, utility models, industrial designs, computer programs or other results of intellectual activity, subject to legal protection in accordance with current legislation, and can serve as a technological basis certain practical activities in the civil or military sphere.

Note - Includes methods and techniques for the production of goods and services, as well as their practical implementation in the form of technological processes, organizational and technical systems.

3.10 technological process: A mutually agreed upon network hierarchy of work performed by validated mechanisms of the supporting technical system to advance the target system through its life cycle.

3.11 technical system(ensuring the technological process): Network hierarchy of verified mechanisms that ensure the execution of the technological process.

Note - At different stages of the life cycle they can be documentation, software, technological equipment, etc.

3.12 product: A type of product that can be torn away from the manufacturer and the production and consumption of which by consumers can be carried out not in concert, but at different points in time (asynchronously in time), direct interaction between the manufacturer and the consumer is not required.

Note - A mandatory characteristic of a product is the absolute value of the date and/or time (for example, date and time of manufacture, date of sale, etc.).

3.13 technology transfer: The process of transferring technology and the corresponding rights to them from the transferring party to the receiving party for the purpose of their subsequent implementation and use.

NOTE Typically, as a result of some form of technology transfer, technology that exists as a product in the form of a service that can be provided by the transferring party to the receiving party is transformed into a product that is first transferred from the transferring party to the receiving party and can then be used by the receiving party independently.

3.14 service: A type of product that cannot be torn away from the manufacturer, its release and consumption by consumers can only be carried out in concert, at the same point in time (synchronously in time), direct interaction between the manufacturer and the consumer is required.

Note - A mandatory characteristic of a service is the relative time of interaction (for example, the duration of the service).

3.15 technology readiness level; UGT: The degree of readiness of NTZ for industrial production and operation of target technical systems, determined on the UGT scale, which has nine qualitative gradations from UGT1 to UGT9 (Appendix A).

Note - The compliance of a specific technology that meets the requirements of the technical specifications with a specific UGT is determined during a technological audit (examination) using a special questionnaire (UGT counter).

4 General provisions

4.1 Activities to develop technology in high-tech industries, its scientific and technological support and development in the production of fundamentally new products created on the basis of the developed technology involve the following stages:

- conducting fundamental research that forms scientific and technical knowledge to create samples of innovative products;

- identifying needs for the development of new technologies as the basis for creating innovative products;

- generating, using the noted groundwork, ideas for creating fundamentally new technologies for the development of the specified innovative products;

- conducting applied research aimed at testing the technical feasibility of the proposed idea;

- carrying out development work, including the development of technology for innovative products, as well as the creation of a prototype of innovative products;

- mastering a sample created on the basis of a fundamentally new technology in production.

4.2 The stages of this activity can be carried out either entirely within one organization or by several organizations separately, independently or in cooperation of one form or another.

4.3 Development of technology by several different organizations, and in large organizations - by their individual structural divisions, necessarily involves:

- implementation of technology transfer, during which there is a transfer from one organization (transferring party) to another (receiving party) of the results of intellectual activity, completed technologies (UGT9, see Appendix A) and/or jointly developed unfinished technologies (UGT1-UGT8, see . Appendix A), as well as the creation of appropriate supporting systems and mechanisms (production systems with the level of production readiness UGP1-UGP9, see Appendix A);

- related accounting, control of use and protection of the noted results of intellectual activity (RIA);

- identifying the level of technology readiness of the transferring party, the readiness of the receiving party to use the technology, other aspects arising during technology transfer (can be carried out during a technology audit).

4.4 The general goal of technology transfer is the economically feasible transfer of the technical knowledge of the manufacturer, who acts as the transferring party, into industrial technology operating at the consumer, who acts as the receiving party, for subsequent commercial or non-commercial use.

4.5 The creation of complex target vehicles, such as an aircraft, requires the coordinated use of a significant number of technologies from various manufacturers. At the early stages of creating a promising vehicle, it is necessary to determine not only the entire list of technologies required for a specific vehicle, but also to determine the degree of their compatibility with each other when promoting the vehicle through its life cycle. The degree of compatibility of pairs of technologies is determined by the scale of the level of readiness for integration (LR), which has nine qualitative gradations (LR1-UR9, see Appendix A). The compatibility of pairs of technologies from NTZ with a specific UGI is determined through expert assessment.

4.6 The need to share two or more technologies from different manufacturers with UGT8 or less (unfinished technology) in one vehicle leads to technology transfer (NTT) from one manufacturer to another. Technology transfer in this case is implemented in the form of a joint project to transfer technology from one manufacturer’s UGT to the supporting system of a manufacturer of another technology with UGT for compatibility testing and subsequent evaluation by UGT experts with recording of supporting artifacts.

4.7 In order to manage the process of promotion by supporting systems of the target vehicle along the life cycle, a generalized readiness characteristic is introduced - the system readiness level (SLA). The system readiness level is a scale of five levels, each of which corresponds to a numerical range in the range from 0 to 1. For all ranges, the UGS values ​​are calculated from the UGT and UGI values.

4.8 The readiness levels identified for a specific technology are recorded in the technology passport. Based on the completed technology passports, their preliminary search and selection can be carried out in the future for use in the target or supporting vehicle.

5 Technology transfer process

5.1 General provisions

5.1.1 The technology transfer process consists of the following stages:

- identification of the need for technology, on the one hand, and the object of sale, on the other hand;

- assessment of costs associated with the acquisition of technologies;

- information search;

- comparative analysis, assessment of readiness level and choice of technology;

- negotiations between the seller and buyer of technology;

- conclusion of an agreement and transfer of technology (or other result of intellectual activity);

- use of technology and monitoring of results.

5.1.2 In order to check the technological state of the organization and/or identify the level of technology readiness, a technology audit is carried out. The general goal of a technology audit is to assess the organization’s ability to implement new technologies, work with technology partners, and shape the direction of enterprise development for the most successful integration or transfer of new technologies. A technology audit can be initiated at any stage of the technology transfer process.

5.1.3 Direct technology transfer can be implemented through one or more technology transfer channels, which can be:

- purchase and sale of technologies, high-tech materials, equipment, technologies, systems;

- licensing agreements, agreements on technology transfer, technological documentation;

- joint research, development, production, sales of high-tech products by organizations and enterprises; national scientific, technical, industrial and other projects and programs;

- technology transfer within transnational corporations, national consortia, financial and industrial groups;

- research, development, production within joint ventures with partners, including foreign ones;

- international and national scientific, technical, industrial and other projects and programs;

- cooperative activities of organizations and enterprises with the participation of research organizations, design bureaus, educational institutions conducting research and development, and their employees;

- transfer of documentation, samples, devices, materials and substances, computer programs, know-how, R&D results within the framework of marketing activities and dealer (distribution) agreements;

- leasing of premises and other relationships in connection with which employees of third-party organizations may have potential access to technology;

- temporary stay in the laboratories of research organizations, design bureaus, educational institutions of specialists, including business travelers, interns, graduate students, and students.

5.2 Participants in the technology transfer process

5.2.1 Participants in the technology transfer process are entities creating technologies or producers, i.e. the transferring party, and entities using ready-made technologies, or consumers, i.e. the receiving party, as well as, in some cases, government authorities of the Russian Federation and other states.

5.2.2 The entities creating technologies can be:

- organizations ordering the creation of technology (customers);

- investors involved in the creation of technologies;

- organizations creating technologies (executors);

- authors and co-authors (creators, inventors and their groups) of technologies;

- competing organizations that create competitive technologies based on their own developments (executors).

5.2.3 Subjects using ready-made technologies may include:

- organizations - owners (co-owners, right holders, including licensors and management founders) of technologies;

- investors involved in the use of technology;

- organizations - acquirers (purchasers) of technologies;

- organizations - technology licensees;

- organizations - users of technologies under commercial concession agreements;

- organizations - trust managers of technologies under trust management agreements;

- personnel [staff, workers, officials (job applicants, working, resigning, quitting)] organizations involved in the use of technology;

- competing organizations - owners (co-owners, copyright holders, including licensors and management founders) of competitive technologies created on the basis of their own developments.

5.2.4 The objectives of the transfer of acquired proprietary technologies for the transferring party are usually:

- making a profit from the sale of created intellectual property, which the transferring party cannot bring to a higher UGT due to the fact that the organization specializes only in the initial stages of work on creating technology or does not have and cannot attract additional resources necessary to bring the obtained results of intellectual activity to higher UGT;

- bringing these results to a higher UGT does not correspond to the activity profile and development strategy of the transferring party;

- extraction of additional income from the sale of RIA, the costs of the creation of which the transferring party has already covered and the use of which it expects to cease in the short term in connection with the transition to the use of the RIA that has just been achieved;

- extraction of additional income from the sale of services and goods related to the transferred technologies to the organization - the acquirer of technologies (in particular, income from the sale of services for training the personnel of the specified organization, income from the supply of equipment for the production of products created on the basis of the use of transferred technologies, etc.); P.);

- minimizing the risk of illegal use by another organization of technologies created by the transferring party;

- involvement in work on the improvement and development of transferred technologies of the acquiring organization, which has scientific and technological capabilities for their improvement/development;

- providing access to the technologies necessary for the organization through the reciprocal transfer of its own technologies;

- overcoming barriers to access to the foreign market for finished products created on the basis of transferred technologies;

- obtaining, in one form or another, control over the organization that acquires the RIA (starting from control of the technical conditions for the production of products created on the basis of the transferred results of intellectual activity, and control of profits from the sale of these products through the royalty rate, and ending with control of the activities of the organization - the acquirer of the RIA through receiving as payment for the shares of this organization transferred to RIA).

5.2.5 The purposes for acquiring third party technology for the host are typically:

- obtaining ready-made technologies and other RIA of a high scientific and technical level required by the organization and, as a result, avoiding the risks of obtaining RIA with significantly worse characteristics when independently conducting R&D aimed at obtaining these technologies;

- reduction of time and financial resources required to obtain new technologies;

- increasing the level of competence of our own researchers/developers in conducting R&D stages aimed at obtaining this type of technology;

- introduction to the national market of products created on the basis of acquired technologies, similar to imported ones; using for its implementation the high reputation of the organization that transferred the relevant RIA and reducing the volume of imports of similar foreign-made products;

- bringing products created on the basis of acquired technologies to foreign markets and generating income from their export.

5.2.6 The acquisition of third-party technologies for the receiving party is associated with risks:

- purchase of obsolete (obsolete) technology that has no market prospects in the future;

- becoming technologically dependent on an organization that provides technology or other RIA.

5.3 Functions of participants in the technology transfer process in terms of accounting, control and protection of technologies

5.3.1 The mandatory functions of the transferring and receiving parties during technology transfer include: accounting for transferred/received technologies, control of the use of transferred/received technologies, protection of transferred/received technologies.

5.3.2 Accounting for transferred/received technologies should provide authorized officials of the organization transferring/acquiring technologies and other RIAs with prompt provision of reliable updated data on the transfer/acquisition of technologies by this organization, including data on the total number of transferred/acquired technologies, the distribution of this quantities by year of transfer/acquisition and other aspects of interest to them in order to:

- monitoring and analysis of compliance of the actual state and development trends in the field of transfer/acquisition of technologies and other RIA with the organization’s targets in this area;

- identifying, based on their results, phenomena and trends in the field of transfer/acquisition of technologies and other RIA that do not meet the interests of the organization, as well as insufficiently used opportunities in this area;

- making informed management decisions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the transfer/acquisition of technologies and other RIA.

5.3.3 Control over the use of transferred technologies should allow the transferring party to monitor compliance by the organization receiving technologies and other RIA with its contractual obligations to use the technologies provided to it, to prevent its violation of these obligations and to prevent damage to the transferring party, respectively, from providing its technologies to the receiving party.

5.3.4 Control of the use of acquired technologies should allow the receiving party to monitor the effectiveness of the use of acquired technologies and take prompt measures to eliminate facts of ineffective use of acquired technologies.

5.3.5 Protection of transferred technologies should ensure the prevention of damage to the transferring party:

- premature disclosure of the essence of such technologies to the receiving party and, accordingly, the latter’s loss of interest in acquiring these technologies;

- illegal disclosure of the essence of the noted technologies to organizations not involved in the transfer/acquisition of relevant technologies.

5.3.6 Protection of acquired technologies must ensure compliance by the organization acquiring technologies and other RIA with its contractual obligations to protect the technologies it has received.

Appendix A (mandatory). Typical scales used to assess the level of technology readiness

Appendix A
(required)

Table A.1 - Typical scales used to assess the level of technology readiness

Electronic document text
prepared by Kodeks JSC and verified against:
official publication
M.: Standartinform, 2016

Yuri Nikolaevich, NPO Saturn annually increases production volumes, and the design department, like other departments of the enterprise, is faced with the task of ensuring efficient production of serial products. At the same time, we are talking about the fact that we must not forget about creating a powerful scientific and technical foundation, about “preparing for the future.” What caused this need? And what is NTZ?

NPO Saturn has set itself the task of being an effective enterprise not only in the short term, but also in the next 30-50 years or more. NPO Saturn operates in a knowledge-intensive field, and in order to remain a competitive enterprise, we need to prepare for the future today, otherwise the market will be occupied by other suppliers. That is why the creation of a scientific and technical reserve (STR) is something that we must work on constantly, work effectively, despite the ever-increasing volume of commercial products.

What is OKB? These are the people who are responsible for the “life” of the design of gas turbine engines, from the idea to its implementation at the NTZ stage, responsible for carrying out development work, manufacturing the first production engine, supporting serial products in production and operation. OKB is the future of the enterprise.

What is the scientific and technical basis? These are innovative solutions, design schemes, technologies that must be developed and experimentally tested before the start of development work.

Before the start of R&D work on SaM146, our enterprise had formed an NTZ in the field of numerical modeling of the most complex physical processes: aerodynamics, thermal state, strength, and also introduced end-to-end design/manufacturing technology based on 3D CAD/CAM systems. A difficult path was passed, in which not only the design bureau, but also almost all services of the enterprise participated: the chief engineer, the director of information technology, the director of production, etc. For example, the creation of a scientific and technical basis only in numerical methods of gas dynamics required more than 15 years. First there was an idea. It is not enough to be able to experimentally verify what we have obtained; we need to predict numerically at the design stage: what will we get? We began to study numerical methods of gas dynamics: from simple, one-dimensional, to the most complex, three-dimensional, taking into account the non-stationary nature of gas-dynamic processes. At first we just learned to count. Then we learned to count so that what we count corresponds to what we then obtain experimentally. After this, from the methodological task - to learn how to do it - it was necessary to learn how to do it quickly, so as to fit into the design process. It took us more than three months when we first began to count, this was in the late 90s, in order to simulate the gas flow in the interblade channel of the turbine. And that meant: we can count. But it was not enough to design. Those calculations that previously took months are now performed up to a thousand per day. This result was preceded by a whole range of work, from improving calculation methods and computing tools to the formation of specialists who think differently, who understand that risks that were not verified at the design stage will manifest themselves a hundredfold during the development of the engine. This is just a small example of the technical groundwork, the results of which we are already using today.

In the early 2000s, we formed a list of NTZ, which gave us the opportunity to create SaM146 and implement other projects. Much of that list has been implemented, in terms of design and in terms of industrial manufacturing technologies. In 2007, we rethought the creation of NTZ and began to manage the creation of NTZ as a separate project.

Today we - Saturn - are able not only to design, but also to manufacture the most complex elements of a gas turbine engine. For example, a monowheel with a diameter of about one meter, with complex spatial profiling of the blades and contours of the flow part.

We are actively working on the introduction of prototyping technologies, when parts can be grown in a special installation using a mathematical model. Prototyping technologies make it possible to immediately grow metal parts with properties comparable to parts produced by casting. We have modern technologies that allow us to organize and successfully implement promising Saturn programs. In 2012, we qualitatively updated the NTZ program in the interests of the future of NPO Saturn. We are holding a scientific and technical council of the enterprise and have approved the main projects of the program for the creation of NTZ. Among the main projects, it should be noted the work on the development and use of parts made of composite materials in the design of advanced engines.

I emphasize that it is important not only to occupy our niche in the range of products that are sold on the market today, it is important to create the groundwork for their development. We work in the global market with very serious players, such as Safran, General Electric, Rolls-Royce, etc. In order to match and even get ahead of the leaders in gas turbine construction, we need to manage the concept of creating a scientific and technical basis.

How much has the ideology of the existence of the design bureau of NPO Saturn changed under the conditions of the company's entry into the UEC, the Russian Technologies State Corporation?

I repeat, we do not live in isolation. There are market demands, such as providing greater mobility through aviation, while we must have less and less impact on the environment; the market is waiting for new types of energy. These are global strategic tasks. These tasks are dictated by the market, set by the Ministry of Industry and Trade to the Russian Technologies State Corporation, OPK Oboronprom, and the United Engine Corporation. And due to the fact that NPO Saturn is part of the UEC, and our design bureau is the base design bureau of the UEC, these tasks are directly facing our design bureau.

Today, together with UEC, we are working on the creation of 22 critical technologies, which by 2020-2025 should not only eliminate the lag of UEC from Western companies, but also ensure superiority in the market. This is not only the creation of new technologies, it is the formation of a system for creating scientific and technical knowledge.

We work with industry institutes, such as TsAGI, CIAM, VIAM, we work with university science, we work to eliminate the “brain drain” from Russia to the West. Today we are already attracting specialists who went to work abroad so that they can start working for our industry again. And these functions include our design bureau as the base design bureau of the United Engine Corporation.

We participate in the formation of UEC programs and often act as opponents, defending the position of Saturn. For example, in terms of the fact that it is not enough to occupy a market niche using the SaM146 engine. It may seem that the goal has been achieved, we have occupied our niche in the market. But our goal is to be the first in our segment. To do this, it is necessary, on the one hand, to work to improve its characteristics, and on the other, to reduce its cost in production. We must be attractive to the customer, and that means improving customer support in operation. This is a serious set of tasks, and one of the important components of this complex: the customer must know that our engine will be improved. Every year it will be better, more reliable, with the resource necessary for the customer and meeting the needs of expanding the range of its work. For example, engine approval for operating conditions in the Mexican highlands. Or another example, a possible proposal for the GSS, for the SSJ NG for 115-130 people. How this can be achieved is an increase in the thrust of the SaM146. And we are obliged to have our own solution in the interests of the customer, how this can be ensured. From a technical point of view, a design bureau should always have an answer to a potential customer question. We are working on this and will continue to work on it constantly.

The Government of the Russian Federation decides:

Appendix No. 1
to providing

part of the creation costs

priority production
electronic components and
radio-electronic equipment

Methodology
determining the rating of applications submitted by Russian organizations for a competition for the right to receive subsidies from the federal budget to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment

1. This methodology determines the rating of applications submitted by Russian organizations for a competition for the right to receive subsidies from the federal budget to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and electronic equipment (hereinafter referred to as organizations, competition, subsidy ), based on the criteria provided for by the Rules for the provision of subsidies from the federal budget to Russian organizations to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 17, 2016 No. 109 " On approval of the Rules for the provision of subsidies from the federal budget to Russian organizations to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment."

The share of the rating awarded to the i-th application according to the criterion relating to the number of newly created and modernized high-tech jobs as part of the implementation of a comprehensive project, the significance of which is 10 percent;

The share of the rating awarded to the i-th application according to the criterion relating to the ratio of the size of the subsidy and the amount of borrowed and (or) own funds planned to be attracted for the implementation of a complex project, the significance of which is 20 percent;

,

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition on the volume of sales of import-substituting or innovative products that will be created during the implementation of a comprehensive project (million rubles);

Minimum volume of sales of import-substituting or innovative products that will be created during the implementation of a comprehensive project established in the tender documentation (million rubles);

The maximum volume of sales of import-substituting or innovative products that will be created during the implementation of a complex project declared by one of the competition participants (million rubles).

,

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition for the number of high-tech jobs created and modernized (pieces);

The minimum number of created and modernized high-tech jobs established in the competition documentation (pieces);

The maximum number of high-tech jobs created and modernized, declared by one of the competition participants (pieces).

5. The rating awarded to the i-th application according to the criterion relating to the ratio of the amount of the subsidy and the amount of borrowed and (or) own funds planned to be raised for the implementation of a complex project () is determined by the formula:

,

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition on the ratio of the amount of the subsidy and the amount of borrowed and (or) own funds planned to be attracted for the implementation of a complex project;

The initial (maximum) size of the ratio of the size of the subsidy and the amount of borrowed and (or) own funds planned to be attracted for the implementation of a complex project, established in the competition documentation.

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition for the number of patents and (or) production secrets (know-how) received (pieces);

The maximum number of received patents and (or) production secrets (know-how), declared by one of the competition participants (pieces).

,

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition regarding the implementation period of the complex project (months);

The initial (maximum) period for the implementation of a complex project, established in the competition documentation (months).

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition regarding experience in implementing a similar complex project (pieces);

The largest number of similar works completed, declared by one of the competition participants (pieces).

Proposal of the i-th participant in the competition for the volume of product exports (thousand US dollars);

The largest volume of product exports declared by one of the competition participants (thousand US dollars).

Appendix No. 2
to providing
from the federal budget subsidies
Russian organizations for compensation
part of the creation costs
scientific and technical groundwork for
development of basic technologies
priority production
electronic components and
radio-electronic equipment

Calculation
the amount of penalties applied to Russian organizations that received subsidies from the federal budget to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment

1. The amount of penalties (thousand rubles) (A) is determined by the formula:

,

The achieved value of the i-th indicator (indicator) of the effectiveness of the implementation of the complex project specified in the subsidy agreement, as of the expiration date of the implementation of the complex project;

The planned value of the i-th indicator (indicator) of the effectiveness of the implementation of a complex project specified in the subsidy agreement;

The share of the application rating determined in accordance with the Rules for the provision of subsidies from the federal budget to Russian organizations to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation on February 17, 2016. No. 109 “On approval of the Rules for the provision of subsidies from the federal budget to Russian organizations to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electronic equipment”, according to the corresponding i-th indicator;

V - the amount of federal budget funds used by the organization as part of the implementation of a complex project at the end of the implementation period of such a project (thousand rubles).

2. The amount of penalties is proportional to the degree of non-achievement of indicators (indicators) of the effectiveness of the implementation of a complex project within the framework of the subprograms of the state program of the Russian Federation "Development of the electronic and radio-electronic industry for 2013 - 2025", specified in the subsidy agreement.

Document overview

Russian organizations of the electronic and radio-electronic industry are provided with subsidies from the federal budget to reimburse part of the costs of creating a scientific and technical basis for the development of basic technologies for the production of priority electronic components and radio-electric equipment. We are talking about the costs of paying for work under R&D contracts in connection with the implementation of a complex project, for the production of prototypes, mock-ups and stands, the production of a pilot series of products and its testing, certification and (or) registration, etc.

The procedure for allocating funds has been established.

Subsidies are provided within the framework of subprograms of the Russian state program for the development of the electronic and radio-electronic industry for 2013-2025. Funds are allocated to organizations that have passed a competitive selection for complex projects whose implementation period does not exceed 5 years. In this case, the total cost of the project and the maximum annual subsidy amount for subprograms are as follows. For telecommunications equipment - up to 1.5 billion rubles. and no more than 300 million rubles, for computer equipment - up to 2.5 and no more than 400, for special technological equipment - up to 2 and no more than 300, for intelligent control systems - up to 1 billion rubles. and no more than 200 million rubles.

The competitive selection of projects is carried out in 2 stages. The first is a scientific and technical assessment of projects by an expert council created by the Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade. The second is the assessment of projects that have passed scientific and technical examination by the Ministry's competition commission according to a number of criteria. The main ones are the volume of production and sales of import-substituting or innovative products, the number of newly created high-tech jobs, the number of patents and (or) production secrets (know-how), the implementation period of a complex project and the volume of exports of created products.

1. Quarterly report (86)

   Report

   ... .2012 Financial year (years) ... With tasks design... 31.08. 2011 3. ... year for his great contribution to the development of the domestic electrical industry to the team ... results their issue): 0 number of authorized shares: 0 number of shares held on ...

2. Charter of the municipal formation of the urban district of the city of Kostroma

   Article

   ... 2011 of the year No. 199, dated September 29 2011 of the year No. 200, April 12 2012 of the year...one of the year. 9. Results voting and adopted on referendum... teams and performers, etc.), cultural programs on... 1) defines the main tasks and directions of development...

3. Quarterly report open joint stock company "Novolipetsk Metallurgical Plant" issuer code 00102-a for the first quarter of 2005

   Report

   Until 1.01. 2011 The authority that issued... 01.11. 2012 d. License issued on basis... 2005 year By results works for 2004 year (on 1 ... - conclusion with labor team of the Company (by the authorized body... in accordance with the assigned on him tasks: 1. Represents...

4. Quarterly report open joint stock company "Volgatelecom" (3)

   Report

   04.10.2012 ); Licensed by the Ministry... results 2003 of the year up to 11.1% on results 2004 of the year. For 2004 yearon ... on repayment, but no later than December 31. 2011 ...take into account the interests of labor team, partners, creditors... In 2005 year priority tasks Societies in the area...

5. Quarterly report of the open joint-stock company for energy and electrification of Kuban

   Report

   Was decided tasks: - industry division on natural monopoly... 31.10. 2011 FSB Directorate... 20.08. 2012 Ministry of Regional..., on which were summed up results works of the past of the year and... Gavrilov to veterans and to the team OJSC "Kubanenergo" on the occasion...