The fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” was written by Krylov in 1814, but this in no way diminishes its significance and relevance for the modern generation, rather, quite the contrary, because science does not stand still, and, unfortunately, not everyone strives to comprehend it. At the same time, only a few admit their lack of education; the rest turn into the same Monkeys as in this fable. We invite you to read it now.
Fable "The Monkey and the Glasses"
The monkey's eyes became weak in old age;
And she heard from people,
That this evil is not yet so big hands:
All you have to do is get glasses.
She got herself half a dozen glasses;
He turns his glasses this way and that:
Either he will press them to the crown, or he will string them on his tail,
Sometimes he sniffs them, sometimes he licks them;
The glasses don't work at all.
“Ugh, the abyss! - she says, - and that fool,
Who listens to all human lies:
They only lied to me about the Glasses;
But there’s no use for hair in them.”
The monkey is here out of frustration and sadness
Oh stone, there were so many of them,
That only the splashes sparkled.
Unfortunately, this is what happens to people:
No matter how useful a thing is, without knowing its price,
The ignoramus tends to make everything worse about her;
And if the ignorant is more knowledgeable,
So he still drives her.
Moral of Krylov's fable “The Monkey and the Glasses”
The moral of the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” is not only traditionally written in the last lines of the work, but even structurally highlighted by an empty line, and it is deciphered as follows: if you don’t know how to use this or that thing or information, this does not mean that it is useless. And ridiculing or banning it (when we're talking about about officials), Monkey people expose themselves to ridicule.
Analysis of the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses”
The plot of the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” is banal. The monkey - in Russian folklore a rather stupid animal, but very similar in its perception of the world and actions to a person - heard from people that the problem of vision deteriorating with old age can be corrected with the help of glasses. Without figuring out what was what, she got herself more of them (half a dozen - 6 pieces) and, trying the glasses on different parts of the body (after all, Monkey didn’t ask/didn’t listen to how to use them correctly), she was very surprised why they weren’t help. At the end of the story, the animal, offended by people, calling them liars and having never found a use for an object unknown to it, breaks its glasses on a stone.
A simple situation, but so clear, especially considering that the Monkey here personifies all the ignorant, and the glasses represent science. And everything wouldn’t be so sad if ignoramuses were found only among ordinary people, but there are enough examples in history when Monkey people occupied high-ranking positions and, with their ignorance, deprived others (albeit temporarily, until the change of power) of new knowledge and opportunities.
Winged expressions from the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses”
- “The fool who listens to all human lies” is used as a mockery in the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” at those who are too great importance attaches to the opinions/words of others.
- “The monkey’s eyes have become weak in old age” is one type of self-irony in relation to one’s own myopia.
In her old age, the monkey began to see poorly, but she heard from people that this could be easily corrected with the help of glasses. She got herself glasses, but didn't know how to use them correctly. She put them on the crown and tail, sniffed and licked them. But this didn’t make me see any better. Then the Monkey decided that people were all lying and broke all the glasses on a stone.
Read the fable The Monkey and the Glasses online
The monkey's eyes became weak in old age;
And she heard from people,
That this evil is not yet so big hands:
All you have to do is get glasses.
She got herself half a dozen glasses;
He turns his glasses this way and that:
Either he will press them to the crown, or he will string them on his tail,
Sometimes he sniffs them, sometimes he licks them;
The glasses don't work at all.
“Ugh, the abyss! - she says, - and that fool,
Who listens to all human lies:
They only lied to me about the Glasses;
But there’s no use for hair in them.”
The monkey is here out of frustration and sadness
Oh stone, there were so many of them,
That only the splashes sparkled.
Unfortunately, this is what happens to people:
No matter how useful a thing is, without knowing its price,
The ignoramus tends to make everything worse about her;
And if the ignorant is more knowledgeable,
So he still drives her.
Moral of the story Monkey and glasses
The monkey in the fable plays the role of an ignoramus, and the glasses represent knowledge. But you need to be able to apply the knowledge correctly, then it will be useful. The fable satirizes shortsightedness and ignorance. The author notes that “the ignorant of knowledge” are especially dangerous for society, who with their influence can harm advancement in science.
Published by: Mishka 16.01.2019 12:00 22.07.2019Confirm rating
Rating: 4.9 / 5. Number of ratings: 48
Help make the materials on the site better for the user!
Write the reason for the low rating.
Send
Thanks for your feedback!
Read 1956 times
Other fables by Krylov
-
Bear in the nets - Krylov's fable
The bear is caught in a hunting net and can’t escape: there are guns, spears, and dogs all around. Then he decided to cheat and talk to the catcher: why does he want his head, because the Bear is not at all evil. Ask everyone...
Monkey and glasses drawing
Fable Monkey and glasses read text
The monkey's eyes became weak in old age;
And she heard from people,
That this evil is not yet so big hands:
All you have to do is get glasses.
She got herself half a dozen glasses;
He turns his glasses this way and that:
Either he will press them to the crown, or he will string them on his tail,
Sometimes he sniffs them, sometimes he licks them;
The glasses don't work at all.
“Oh, the abyss!” she says, “and that fool,
Who listens to all human lies:
They only lied to me about the Glasses;
But there’s no use for hair in them.”
The monkey is here out of frustration and sadness
Oh stone, there were so many of them,
That only the splashes sparkled.
And if the ignorant is more knowledgeable,
So he still drives her.
Moral of Ivan Krylov's fable - Monkey and glasses
Unfortunately, this is what happens to people:
No matter how useful a thing is, without knowing its price,
The ignoramus tends to make everything worse about her;
And if the ignorant is more knowledgeable,
So he still drives her.
Moral in your own words, the main idea and meaning of Krylov’s fable
Krylov, under his glasses, showed knowledge that is very often broken by a reluctance to learn, improve, push through, and try. Hence the result: the stupid monkey was left with nothing.
Analysis of the fable Monkey and glasses, the main characters of the fable
“The Monkey and the Glasses” is an easy, precise work, and most importantly, it is a necessary guide to the right actions in life. Krylov’s humor is striking (the glasses are sniffed and licked by the monkey, put on the tail) and prudence in the form of a moral at the end of the fable. Ivan Andreevich once again brought to the stage a person with a serious flaw in order to help many others eradicate a similar flaw in themselves.
About the fable
"The Monkey and the Glasses" is a fable for all times. In it, Krylov quickly, briefly and very accurately revealed the inner essence of a stupid, uneducated, infantile person. The 21st century is the century of new ingenious inventions, which are impossible without the necessary knowledge, perseverance, and the ability to think, analyze, and compare. Reading and studying the fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” at school is an initial guide to action - study long and patiently, diligently and with pleasure, so that later, in adult life, give people new ideas and promote them in life.
From the fine pen of Krylov, the fable about the monkey and half a dozen glasses came out in 1812. This was the year of the war with the French. The allegorical nature of the fable helped the writer talk about ignorant and empty people who scold science and knowledge and do not benefit the state. If there had been fewer such “monkeys” at that time, then the outcome of the war would have been different. The fabulist, laughing and ironizing, raises in his fable the great human problem of stupidity and idleness.
Monkey - the main character
Main actor fables - monkey. She is fidgety, impatient, superficial. Having heard about the benefits of glasses, she immediately tried to correct her weakened vision with their help. But she didn’t specify how to do this. About such “comrades” they say: “a blunder” or “he heard a ringing but does not know where it is.” One can understand the monkey’s haste - she rather wants to see the world with healthy eyes. But haste and ignorance have never brought anyone any benefit, nor has ardor and anger. Was it worth breaking all your glasses to smithereens, only to then remain visually impaired and dissatisfied?
Winged expressions that came from the fable The Monkey and the Glasses
- The fool who listens to all human lies
- The monkey's eyes have become weak in old age
Listen to Ivan Krylov's fable The Monkey and the Glasses
The fable “The Monkey and the Glasses” by Krylov will tell about the stupid Monkey, who broke good glasses because of his own ignorance.
Read the text of the fable:
The monkey's eyes became weak in old age;
And she heard from people,
That this evil is not yet so big hands:
All you have to do is get glasses.
She got herself half a dozen glasses;
He turns his glasses this way and that:
Either he will press them to the crown, or he will string them on his tail,
Sometimes he sniffs them, sometimes he licks them;
The glasses don't work at all.
“Oh, the abyss!” she says, “and that fool,
Who listens to all human lies:
They only lied to me about the Glasses;
But there’s no use for hair in them.”
The monkey is here out of frustration and sadness
Oh stone, there were so many of them,
That only the splashes sparkled.
Unfortunately, this is what happens to people:
No matter how useful a thing is, without knowing its price,
The ignoramus tends to make everything worse about her;
And if the ignorant is more knowledgeable,
So he still drives her.
Moral of the fable Monkey and glasses:
The moral of the story is that often ignorant people, without bothering to inquire about the value of an item, begin to speak badly about it. This happens in real life. For example, people who do not value scientific and technological progress tend to speak about the achievements of mankind in a negative way, forgetting that it is thanks to science that a person is freed from exhausting physical labor, numerous diseases, etc. If a person does not know how to use any thing is not a reason to speak badly about it, the fabulist teaches.
Deep thoughts in an accessible form - this is what can be said about the fables of the talented Russian poet and publicist Ivan Andreevich Krylov. Ornate style, small form, short stanzas, heroes-representatives of the animal world, biting phrases that will later become catchphrases and a mandatory moral that explains everything that the author wanted to convey to the reader. These fables will survive both Krylov and his time, because the vices ridiculed by the author, unfortunately, still reign and flourish in society, which is why his fables are relevant and topical.
A few words about the plot and characters
"The Monkey and the Glasses" is one of the author's most famous fables. The main character of the work is an enterprising monkey. The years take their toll, and in old age the monkey realized that her eyes began to see worse. However, she did not despair, following the example of people, our heroine got hold of glasses, because she had just heard that this wonderful “device” could help out weakened eyes.
But having glasses, as it turns out, is half the battle - you need to know how to use them. And the reader understands that this is precisely what the monkey did not know. She began to improvise. The monkey licked the glasses, and sniffed, and somehow attached it to its tail, and twisted it this way and that, and pressed it to the crown of the head, but nothing good came of it. In frustration and anger, the monkey threw her glasses against a stone, breaking them into flickering fragments. Moreover, she cursed the rumor, saying that there is not an ounce of truth in the stories about glasses, people are all lying. The glasses didn't help the monkey's eyes.
As is usual in most Krylov fables, the author provides a moral at the end.
The moral of the fable, or how the work can be understood differently
It is noteworthy that the moral embedded in the fable can be perceived in different ways. Due to age, education, knowledge of history. Everything is clear with the heroine - it is no coincidence that the author chose a monkey, which personifies stupidity, grimacing, and lack of culture. But the interpretation will be more difficult.
The option is on the surface: everything needs to know its purpose, otherwise even a smart thing will lose value if you don’t understand how to use it. There is a more cunning option, which, in fact, is cited literally by the author - useful thing, falling into the hands of a noble ignoramus, can be not only not accepted and not understood, but also expelled from use. How many times have we observed in life when those in power, without understanding, rejected useful initiatives.
And finally, the most difficult subtext. It is necessary to remember in what times the author lived - it was a glorious time of the formation of academic science in Russia, begun by Lomonosov. Unfortunately, not always “at the helm” Imperial Academy sciences turned out to be worthy people. This institute was often headed by well-established officials. Not only Krylov, but also Pushkin, who had a quick word, wrote about this with malice.
There is an interpretation according to which the monkey, as usual, symbolizes ignorance, but the glasses act as the personification of science and knowledge. Having fallen into the hands of human monkeys, science not only comes under attack, but also simply compromises those who, lacking the necessary knowledge and culture, try to manage and apply it. It looks funny and absurd, and worst of all, it is destructive for science.
What morality should we accept, what exactly were the author’s thoughts? It is difficult to judge this precisely. Literature is not only the work of authors, but also of critics. It is probably correct to perceive the moral side in accordance with your personal understanding. Well, not only the moral of this fable has gone to the people forever, but also idioms, such as “the monkey has become weak-eyed in old age” and the less quotable one - “he is a fool who listens to all human lies.”
